For Your Society

The Justice Department’s inspector general deserves some credit

  • Respect (0%)
  • Funny (0%)
  • Disappointment (0%)
  • Anger (0%)
  • Stress (0%)
  • Whatever (0%)

Harry Litman teaches constitutional law at the University of California at San Diego. He served as deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department from 1993 to 1998 and U.S. attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania from 1998 to 2001.

The report released Thursday by the Justice Department inspector general on events leading up to the 2016 presidential election distributes blame across many quarters for improper conduct by the department and the FBI. Michael Horowitz, the inspector general, found much to criticize in the actions of both the most senior officials — notably then-FBI Director James B. Comey and then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch — as well as line investigators working the criminal probe of Hillary Clinton.

Horowitz blasted Comey for departing “clearly and dramatically” from FBI and department norms in Comey’s public announcements concerning the Clinton email probe. While Horowitz, importantly, found that Comey’s improprieties were not the result of political bias, he nevertheless concluded that “the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the Department as fair administrators of justice.”

Horowitz likewise took Lynch to task for her tarmac meeting with former president Bill Clinton when the investigation against Hillary Clinton was in full throttle: “Lynch’s failure to recognize the appearance problem created by former President Clinton’s visit and to take action to cut the visit short was an error in judgment.”

And Horowitz leveled especially hard-hitting charges of misconduct against Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, two FBI officials (and, at the time, romantic partners) on the Clinton email investigation and, until their misconduct surfaced, on the Robert S. Mueller III investigation. Horowitz found that the two exchanged text messages “that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”

This and similar conduct by five FBI employees, he concluded, “demonstrated extremely poor judgment and a gross lack of professionalism” and merited a referral to the FBI to determine whether there had been violations of the FBI code of conduct.

All in all, a pretty rough report card — one that does not reflect well on Justice or the FBI. Yet it is important to keep in mind: Nothing in the report undermines the legitimacy of the ongoing Mueller probe, as Trump partisans seem poised to claim. If anything, Comey’s misconduct in particular could only have helped Trump.

But Team Trump


Facts are under attack! Support Real Journalism.

share this with your people

FY Society explores American society with original content and analysis, as well as through the lens of curated news and articles.

We are simply trying to tell a story. Our story, the story of America past and present–who we are and how we got here, and perhaps more importantly: where we are going. We have a whole lot more in store, however, so please consider helping us in that effort by visiting the FY Store, or with a donation via Patreon.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Close Menu